
—Md Kafi Khan—
As the world enters 2025, the global risk landscape is reshaped by political uncertainty, accelerating technological disruption, and rapidly evolving geopolitical tensions.
Riskonnect’s New Generation of Risk Report 2025 reveals a world where companies face risks that are faster, more interconnected, and less predictable than ever before.
What is particularly striking is that these realities are not distant global phenomena—they directly echo the emerging challenges of Bangladesh’s own economic, political, and technological environment.
This article synthesises the global insights from the report and interprets them in the context of Bangladesh’s financial sector, corporate ecosystem, regulatory bodies, and national development ambitions.
Risk Connect identifies political risk as one of the top three global threats in 2025. Nearly 97% of organisations worldwide report some level of impact, and 40% describe the impact as significant or severe. Political instability has forced companies to stall hiring plans, delay investments, and postpone expansion strategies .
BANGLADESH CONTEXT:
While Bangladesh has enjoyed sustained economic momentum over the past decade, it also faces periodic political tensions, regulatory uncertainty, and policy transitions that influence business confidence. For example:
Global data shows only 17% of leaders feel very prepared to manage political risks even when those risks are anticipated .
This finding mirrors a structural gap in Bangladeshi institutions: recognition without preparation. Organizations often acknowledge risks but do not build predictive, structured mitigation plans.
The report highlights that 66% of global companies now have geopolitical risk plans an enormous jump from just 19% last year. Yet only 18% feel very prepared to manage such shocks.
Relevance for Bangladesh:
Bangladesh’s economic model is deeply tied to global trade:
Geopolitical shocks US-China trade tensions, Middle East instability, Red Sea disruptions, EU regulatory changes directly impact Bangladesh through supply chain delays, export uncertainty, higher input costs, and currency volatility.
Global experience suggests that even when plans exist, actual disruptions tend to exceed expectations. Bangladesh’s corporates and government agencies must therefore shift from reactive response to scenario-based preparedness.
According to the report, 62% of global leaders fear increased cyber exposure during geopolitical tensions, especially state-backed attacks and supply-chain breaches .
BANGLADESH’S REALITY:
Bangladesh’s rapid digitisation QR payments, MFS expansion, cloud migrations heightens exposure, especially when cybersecurity governance is uneven across institutions.
The report warns that nearly 60% of organizations are exploring agentic AI, yet 55% have not assessed its risks .
Even more concerning: 15% of leaders don’t know if their organizations are adopting agentic AI at all.
GLOBAL CONCERNS INCLUDE:
BANGLADESH IMPLICATIONS:
Bangladesh is at a critical moment in AI adoption:
The absence of institution-level AI governance now poses both regulatory and operational risks.
The report reveals that while 85% of organisations claim to have business continuity plans, only 8% can assess risks across multiple layers of their supply chain. A full 16% cannot monitor third-party risks at all
This is alarming for Bangladesh.
Bangladesh’s digital and financial ecosystems depend on:
Hidden vulnerabilities in second-tier and third-tier suppliers can lead to:
The country requires a deeper, more structured framework for third-party risk management, especially within banks, NBFIs, telecom operators, and logistics networks.
Worldwide, AI use in risk management jumped from 62% (2024) to 70% (2025). Top applications include assessing risks (34%), scenario planning (28%), and forecasting (28%). Yet only 12% feel very prepared to manage AI risks.
Bangladesh’s opportunity:
Bangladesh can leapfrog traditional bottlenecks by adopting AI-driven:
But without governance—policy, oversight, and trained personnel AI introduces its own vulnerabilities.
The report notes:
Bangladesh’s parallel challenge:
The governance structure in banks and corporates is evolving:
This mismatch weakens resilience efforts.
The Bangladesh Imperative: Strategic Shifts Needed Now
Drawing from global evidence and local realities, Bangladesh needs to upgrade its risk posture across several fronts:
Banks, corporates, and regulators must develop annual scenario planning cycles aligned with global volatility.
Bangladesh Bank, BTRC, banks, MFS operators, and ICT Division must jointly develop a cyber readiness framework modeled on NIST, DORA (EU), and MAS (Singapore).
To regulate agentic AI, protect data, and manage algorithmic bias.
Institutions must map critical dependencies and assess risks beyond tier 1 suppliers.
Budget allocation must catch up with global trends.
AI-driven tools, risk dashboards, and integrated GRC systems are now essential—not optional.
Reflection : A New Generation of Risk Requires a New Generation of Preparedness
The New Generation of Risk Report 2025 shows a world where disruptions are not exceptions—they are the norm. The global risk environment now evolves faster than traditional governance and preparedness structures.
For Bangladesh, the message is clear:
Recognize the risks. Prepare for the extremes. Build resilience before disruption hits.
In an interconnected world, Bangladesh cannot afford reactive risk management. With strategic foresight, stronger governance, responsible AI adoption, and deeper cross-border risk visibility, the country can not only withstand global shocks, but emerge more competitive, secure, and resilient.
——————————————-
Writer: Corporate Governance Professional